IMF Social Spending Floors: A fig leaf for austerity?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2281a/2281aba976407a226ca924bc5d45963ea6d3af52" alt=""
Overview
The International Monetary Fund has said that it protects spending on education, health and social protection from cuts in its loan programmes through social spending floors. These measures are a welcome step forward, but are they effective?
Analysis of all 17 IMF loan programmes (Extended Credit Facilities, or ECFs, and Extended Fund Facilities, or EFFs) for low- and middle-income countries during the first two years of the pandemic shows that these floors are deeply inadequate, inconsistent, opaque and failing. They are little more than a fig leaf for harmful austerity, which is driving inequality, poverty and suffering.
Keywords
Additional details
Author(s)
Publisher(s)
DOI
10.21201/2023.621495How to cite this resource
Citation styles vary so we recommend you check what is appropriate for your context. You may choose to cite Oxfam resources as follows:
Author(s)/Editor(s). (Year of publication). Title and sub-title. Place of publication: name of publisher. DOI (where available). URL
Our FAQs page has some examples of this approach.
Finance for Development: What’s at stake?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58330/58330f6d85e92d905ad85ef053486baabbd7aaad" alt=""
El Nino: The case for urgent action
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0eda4/0eda467b18f46f6cca809dcfb8e5c2d04be90916" alt=""